Proposition 64 Public Health & Safety Grant Program

In alphabetical order:

Prop 64 PH&S Cohort 3 Grantees	Lead Public Agency	Award
City of California City	California City Fire Department	$2,182,390
City of Chula Vista	Chula Vista Police Department	$2,708,250
City of Colusa	City of Colusa	$1,668,033
City of El Monte	City of El Monte	$3,000,000
City of Firebaugh	Firebaugh Police Department	$579,439
City of Grass Valley	City of Grass Valley	$3,000,000
City of Hanford	City of Hanford	$2,452,065
City of Madera	Madera Police Department	$605,887
City of Marysville	City of Marysville	$3,000,000
City of Montebello	Montebello Fire Department	$1,278,987
City of Mt. Shasta	Mt. Shasta Police Department	$2,907,211
City of Nevada City	City of Nevada City	$3,000,000
City of Oakland	City of Oakland	$3,000,000
City of Palm Springs	City of Palm Springs	$3,000,000
City of Parlier	City of Parlier	$2,980,000
City of Port Hueneme	Port Hueneme Police Department	$2,646,665
City of Sacramento	Office of the City Manager	$2,999,915
City of San Bernardino	San Bernardino Police Department	$3,000,000
City of San Diego	San Diego Police Department	$1,474,719
City of Suisun	City of Suisun	$2,294,495
City of Vallejo	City of Vallejo	$1,424,000
City/County of San Francisco	Office of the City Manager	$3,000,000
County of Contra Costa	Alcohol and other Drug Services	$2,195,302
County of Del Norte	County Probation Department	$2,998,752
County of El Dorado	County Sheriff’s Office	$2,924,271
County of Humboldt	Health & Human Services	$3,000,000
County of Lake	Community Development Department	$2,996,546
County of Mono	Mono County Probation	$814,798
County of Monterey	County Public Health	$2,972,769
County of Riverside	University Health System	$3,000,000
County of San Benito	San Benito County	$2,997,145
County of San Diego	County Planning & Development	$2,092,520
County of Santa Barbara	County Sheriff’s Office	$2,997,976
County of Santa Cruz	County Health Services Agency	$3,000,000
County of Sonoma	Permit & Resource Management	$2,993,420
County of Stanislaus	County Sheriff’s Office	$3,000,000
County of Trinity	County Sheriff’s Office	$1,648,795
	Total Awarded for Cohort 3:	$93,787,468

Local Evaluation Plans (LEPs)

LEPs are a mandatory component of the Prop 64 PH&S Grants. These LEPs ensure projects funded can be evaluated to determine their impact and effectiveness and should describe how the project will be monitored and evaluated and shows how evaluation results will be used for project improvement and decision making.

In addition, the Prop 64 PH&S Grants are required to submit a 5-Year Local Evaluation Report (LER) to identify whether the project was successful in achieving its goals and objectives identified in their application for funding and LEP.

City of California City	City of Chula Vista	City of Colusa
City of El Monte	City of Firebaugh	City of Grass Valley
City of Hanford	City of Madera	City of Marysville
City of Montebello	City of Mt. Shasta	City of Nevada City
City of Oakland	City of Palm Springs	City of Parlier
City of Port Hueneme	City of Sacramento	City of San Bernardino
City of San Diego	City of Suisun	City of Vallejo
Contra Costa County	Del Norte County	El Dorado County
Humboldt County	Lake County	Mono County
Monterey County	Riverside County	San Benito County
San Diego County	Santa Barbara County	Santa Cruz County
Sonoma County	Stanislaus County	Trinity County
City/County of San Francisco

Proposition 64 Grant Forms, Templates, and Samples

Criteria for Non-Governmental Organizations form

Fixed Asset Request Sample

Food & Beverage Justification Request form

Grantee Contact Information Sheet form

Incentive/Stipend Justification Request form

Incentive Inventory and Log Sample

Salaries & Benefits Worksheet Sample

Time-Tracking Activity Sample

Subcontractor Language Sample

 

---

July 11, 2023 - Cohort 3 Invoice and Desk Review Webinar

June 21, 2023 – Local Evlaution Plan (LEP) & Quaterly Progress Report (QPR) Webinar

May 23 - 25, 2023 – Grantee Orientation – Orientation Agenda

1. Orientation Recording, Day 1- May 23, 2023
2. Orientation Recording, Day 2- May 24, 2023
3. Orientation Recording, Day 3- May 25, 2023

Orientation Virtual Binder

Section 1 – Grant Contact Information

1. BSCC Prop 64 Staff Contact Information
2. Prop 64 Cohort 3 Grantee Contact Information
3. Prop 64 Cohort 3 Grant Project Summaries

Section 2 – BSCC and Grant Overviews

1. BSCC and Prop 64 Overview

Section 3 – Administrative Responsibilities

1. Prop 64 Administrative Responsibilities PowerPoint
2. Prop 64 Cohort 3 Grant Agreement Sample
3. Mandatory Language for Subcontractors
4. BSCC NGO Assurance Form
5. Grantee Contact Information Sheet
6. BSCC Grant Administration Guide
7. Justification for Food & Beverage
8. Justification for Participant & Program Incentives
9. Incentive Inventory & Log Sample
10. Fixed Asset Request Sample

Section 4 – Programmatic Requirements

1. 1. Prop 64 Programmatic Requirements PowerPoint
   2. UPDATED July 2024 SAMPLE CMV Tool with Instructions

Sample Comprehensive Monitoring Visit (CMV) Tool

1. General Expectations for On-Site CMV

Section 5 – Fiscal Responsibilities

1. Fiscal Responsibilities
2. Invoice Worksheet Sample
3. Budget Modification Sample
4. Invoice Supporting Documentation for Desk Reviews
5. Activity Time-Tracking Sample
6. Grant Audit Requirement

Section 6 – Data Collection & Evaluation Requirements

1. Data Collection & Reporting PowerPoint
2. Local Evaluation Plan & Report Guidelines
3. Local Evaluation Plan Template
4. Local Evaluation Plan Rubric
5. Race & Ethnicity Form
6. Assembly Bill 1998
7. Evaluator Roles
8. Data Collection Tips
9. Evaluation Resources
10. Statewide Logic Model
11. Data Reporting Guide & Instructions for QPRs
12. Prop 64 Quarterly Progress Report- Part 1
13. Prop 64 Quarterly Progress Report- Part 2
14. Prop 64 Quarterly Progress Report- Part 1 PreparatoryForm
15. Prop 64 Quarterly Progress Report- Part 2 PreparatoryForm

This competitive RFP made $150 million available to California Counties and Cities that have not banned both indoor and outdoor commercial cannabis cultivation, or retail sale of marijuana or marijuana products.

• Prop 64 Cohort 3 RFP Instruction Packet

Proposals were submitted using an online application process that closed December 2, 2022. Completed applications included:

1. Prop 64 Proposal Budget and Budget Narrative Attachment
2. Letter of Eligibility
3. Certification of Compliance with BSCC Policies on Debarment, Fraud, Theft, and Embezzlement
4. Criteria for Non-Governmental Organizations Receiving BSCC Grant Funds
5. Letter(s) of Commitment
6. Project Work Plan (if applicable)
7. Governing Board Resolution - Sample(optional; not required for proposal submission)

 

Bidders’ Conference

On November 9, 2022, the BSCC held a virtual Proposition 64 Request for Proposals (RFP) Bidders’ Conference. The BSCC holds these conferences to provide clarity on RFP instructions and to answer technical questions from prospective applicants about the RFP process.

• Bidders’ Conference PowerPoint Presentation
• Bidders' Conference Recording

In alphabetical order:

Prop 64 PH&S Cohort 2 Grantees	Lead Public Agency	Award
City & County of San Francisco	Office of the City Administrator	$1,000,000
City of Berkeley	City of Berkeley	$1,000,000
City of Chula Vista	Chula Vista Police Department	$1,000,000
City of Firebaugh	City of Firebaugh Police Department	$298,881
City of Fresno (w/City of Mendota)	City of Fresno Police Department	$1,958,057
City of La Mesa	City of La Mesa	$1,000,000
City of Los Angeles	City of Los Angeles Dept. of Cannabis Regulation	$1,000,000
City of Merced	City of Merced	$885,546
City of Mt. Shasta	Mt. Shasta Police Department	$836,977
City of Nevada City	City of Nevada City	$1,000,000
City of Oakland	City of Oakland	$997,694
City of Palm Springs	City of Palm Springs	$1,000,000
City of Pomona	City of Pomona	$1,000,000
City of Port Hueneme	City of Port Hueneme Police Department	$998,126
City of Sacramento	Office of the City Manager	$999,555
City of San Diego	City of San Diego Police Department	$999,960
City of Woodlake	City of Woodlake	$600,368
County of Inyo	Inyo County Probation Department	$779,537
County of Mendocino	Mendocino County Probation	$866,484
County of Mono	Mono County Probation	$814,798
County of Nevada	Nevada County Superintendent of Schools Office	$1,000,000
County of Santa Barbara	Department of Behavioral Wellness	$959,859
	Total Awarded for Cohort 2:	$20,995,842

Local Evaluation Reports (LERs)

LERs are a mandatory component of the Prop 64 PH&S Grants. The LER documents the activities completed with the support of grant funds and the outcomes achieved. BSCC will use this report to verify the grant money was well spent and to describe the impacts of the project.

 

Cohort 2 LERs

City & County of San Francisco	City of Berkeley
City of Chula Vista	City of Firebaugh
City of Fresno & Mendota	City of La Mesa
City of Los Angeles	City of Merced
City of Mt. Shasta	City of Nevada City
City of Oakland	City of Palm Springs
City of Pomona - Unavailable	City of Port Hueneme
City of Sacramento	City of San Diego
City of Woodlake	County of Inyo
County of Mendocino	County of Mono
County of Nevada	County of Santa Barbara

Local Evaluation Plans (LEPs)

LEPs are a mandatory component of the Prop 64 PH&S Grants. These LEPs ensure projects funded can be evaluated to determine their impact and effectiveness and should describe how the project will be monitored and evaluated and shows how evaluation results will be used for project improvement and decision making. There is no formal template for the LEPs; however, the BSCC provides a guideline that, at a minimum, addresses the following:

• Cover Page
• Project Background
• Process Evaluation Method and Design
• Outcome Evaluation Method and Design
• Project Logic Model
• Appendices (if applicable)

In addition, the Prop 64 PH&S Grants are required to submit a 3-Year Local Evaluation Report (LER) to identify whether the project was successful in achieving its goals and objectives identified in their application for funding and LEP. LERs will be posted at the end of each cohort’s contract period.

 

Cohort 2 LEPs

City & County of San Francisco	City of Berkeley
City of Chula Vista	City of Firebaugh
City of Fresno & Mendota	City of La Mesa
City of Los Angeles	City of Merced
City of Mt. Shasta	City of Nevada City
City of Oakland	City of Palm Springs
City of Pomona	City of Port Hueneme
City of Sacramento	City of San Diego
City of Woodlake	County of Inyo
County of Mendocino	County of Mono
County of Nevada	County of Santa Barbara

The BSCC released the Proposition 64 Public Health and Safety (Prop 64 PH&S) Grant Program Cohort 2, Request for Proposals (RFP) on November 20, 2020 with a proposal submittal date of January 29, 2021. The RFP made available $51,788,690 through a competitive process for projects that address local impacts due to the legalization of adult-use recreational cannabis in California

• Prop 64 Cohort 2 RFP

 

Bidders’ Conference

A Bidders’ Conference was held Thursday, December 10, 2020 to answer technical questions from prospective applicants about the Cohort 2 RFP and provide clarity on RFP instructions.

• 12.10.2020 Agenda
• 12.10.2020 PowerPoint Presentation
• 12.10.2020 Bidders' Conference Recording

 

Prop 64 PH&S Scoring Panel

The Prop 64 PH&S Scoring Panel members met on February 17, 2021 and were trained on the Cohort 2 RFP and RFP Rating Factors and Criteria. Learn more about ESCs and Scoring Panels.

 

#	Name	Title	Organization /Agency
1	Gordon Baranco Chair	BSCC Board Member	Board of State and Community Corrections
2	Tanja Heitman*	Chief Probation Officer	Santa Barbara County
3	Shannan Moon	Sheriff	Nevada County
4	Hollie Hall*	Consultant, PhD.	Watershed Resource Specialist Humboldt, Trinity, and Mendocino Counties
5	Dave Neilsen*	Retired, Deputy Director	CA Department Alcohol & Drug Programs
6	Amy Irani*	Director	Environmental Health Nevada County
7	Jon Heredia	Chief Legal Officer Adjunct Professor of Cannabis Law	Chief Legal Officer Mirage Medicinal Golden Gate University School of Law
8	Michael Salvador*	Police Chief	City of Atwater
9	Miamah Reed	Youth Services Specialist	Sacramento Unified School District

*Original Prop 64 PH&S Executive Steering Committee (ESC) members

Cohort 2 Project Contact List (as of February 8, 2023)

Invoice Narrative Examples  

October 26, 2021 – Invoice and Desk Review Webinar

1. Prop 64 Invoicing and Desk Review PowerPoint
2. Prop 64 Invoice Supporting Documentation Packet Instructions
3. Prop 64 Supporting Documentation Checklist
4. Prop 64 Grantee Salaries and Benefits Worksheet

September 8, 2021- Webinar: Cannabis Industry, Public Health, and Equity

August 5, 2021- Quarterly Progress Reports (QPR) – QPR Agenda – QPR Webinar

1. Prop 64 C2 QPR Q1_2 Grantee
2. Prop 64 C2 QPR Guide_Grantee

July 14, 2021 - Local Evaluation Plan (LEP) Webinar – LEP Agenda – LEP Webinar

1. Local Evaluation Plan (LEP) and Local Evaluation Report (LER) Guidelines
2. LEP Scoring Rubric
3. Logic Model A
4. Logic Model B
5. Sample LEPs - Sample A PDF - Sample B PDF
6. Evaluation Resources
7. Statewide Logic Model

June 21 - 23, 2021 – Grantee Orientation – Orientation Agenda

1. Orientation Recording, Day 1- June 22, 2021
2. Orientation Recording, Day 2- June 23, 2021
3. Orientation Recording, Day 3- June 24, 2021

Section 1 – Grant Contact Information

1. BSCC Prop 64 Staff Contact Information
2. Prop 64 Cohort 2 Grantee Contact Information
3. Prop 64 Cohort 2 Grant Project Summaries

Section 2 – BSCC and Grant Overviews

1. BSCC and Prop 64 Overview
2. BSCC Grants Coronavirus FAQs

Section 3 – Administrative Responsibilities

1. Prop 64 Administrative Responsibilities PowerPoint
2. Prop 64 Cohort 2 Grant Agreement Sample
3. BSCC NGO Assurance Form
4. Grantee Contact Information Sheet
5. BSCC Grant Administration Guide
6. Justification for Food & Beverage
7. Justification for Participant & Program Incentives
8. Incentive Inventory & Log Sample
9. Fixed Asset Request Sample

Section 4 – Programmatic Requirements

1. Prop 64 Programmatic Requirements PowerPoint
2. UPDATED July 2024 SAMPLE CMV tool with Instruction

Sample Comprehensive Monitoring Visit (CMV) Tool

3. General Expectations for On-Site CMV
4. Principles of Effective Intervention

Section 5 – Fiscal Responsibilities

1. Fiscal Responsibilities PowerPoint
2. Invoice Workbook Sample
3. Invoice Supporting Documentation
4. Budget Modification Scenarios
5. Grant Audit Requirement

Section 6 – Data Collection & Evaluation Requirements

1. Data Collection & Reporting PowerPoint
2. Local Evaluation Plan & Report Guidelines
3. Local Evaluation Plan Rubric
4. Race & Ethnicity Form
5. Assembly Bill 1998
6. Evaluator Roles
7. Data Collection Tips
8. Evaluation Resources
9. Statewide Logic Model DRAFT
10. Data Reporting Guide & Instructions for QPRs DRAFT
11. Quarterly Progress Report (QPR) Form DRAFT

In alphabetical order:

Prop 64 PH&S Cohort 1 Grantees	Lead Public Agency	Award
Alameda County	Alameda County Probation Dept	$1,000,000
Contra Costa County	Dept. of Alcohol and Other Drugs Services	$999,346
El Dorado County	El Dorado County Sheriff’s Office	$1,000,000
Humboldt County	Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office	$1,000,000
Lake County	Lake County	$996,173
City of Marysville	Yuba County Office of Education	$990,000
Monterey County	Monterey County Administrative Office	$996,545
Santa Cruz County	County of Santa Cruz	$1,000,000
Sonoma County	Permits & Resources Management Dept.	$1,000,000
Trinity County	Trinity County Sheriff’s Office	$1,000,000
	Total Awarded for Cohort 1:	$9,982,064

Local Evaluation Reports (LERs)

LERs are a mandatory component of the Prop 64 PH&S Grants. The LER documents the activities completed with the support of grant funds and the outcomes achieved. BSCC will use this report to verify the grant money was well spent and to describe the impacts of the project.

Alameda County	Contra Costa County
El Dorado County	Humboldt County
Lake County	City of Marysville
Monterey County	Santa Cruz County
Sonoma County	Trinity County

Alameda County	Contra Costa County
El Dorado County	Humboldt County
Lake County	City of Marysville
Monterey County	Santa Cruz County
Sonoma County	Trinity County

The Prop 64 PH&S RFP was originally released on February 14, 2020 with a due date of April 3, 2020. On April 9, 2020, the Board approved an extension for the final RFP submittal due date due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The RFP was re-released to reflect the new RFP due date of Friday, June 5, 2020 and included all corresponding changes to the grant timeline and grant project activities.

• Prop 64 PH&S Grant Program RFP

 

Bidders’ Conference

The BSCC held a Bidders’ Conference on Wednesday, February 26, 2020 to answer technical questions from prospective applicants about the RFP and provide clarity on RFP instructions.

• Bidders’ Conference PowerPoint
• Recorded Presentation

 

Executive Steering Committee

The Prop 64 PH&S Executive Steering Committee met on October 22-23, 2019 and November 13, 2019 to develop content and rating criteria for the Prop 64 PH&S Request for Proposals (RFP). Learn more about ESCs

 

#	Name	Title	Organization/Agency
1	Linda Penner Chair	BSCC Board Member	Board of State and Community Corrections
2	Steve Carney	Chief Deputy, Cannabis Licensing Office	Santa Cruz County Sheriff's Office
3	Manuel Escandon	Director, Student Intervention & Prevention Department	Office of the Fresno County Superintendent of Schools
4	Hollie Hall	Consultant, PhD.	Watershed Resource Specialist Humboldt, Trinity, and Mendocino Counties
5	Tanja Heitman	Chief Probation Officer	Santa Barbara County
6	Amy Irani	Director	Environmental Health Nevada County
7	Vicki Jones	Environmental Health Director	Merced County Public Health
8	Jon Lopey	Sheriff	Siskyou County
9	Renee Menart	Communications & Policy Analyst	Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice
10	Dave Neilsen	Retired, Division Chief/Chief	CA Department Alcohol & Drug Programs CA Department of Mental Health
11	Royal Ramey	Co-Founder	The Forestry and Fire Recruitment Program
12	Sarah Ruby	Deputy Public Defender	Santa Clara County
13	Michael Salvador	Police Chief	City of Atwater
14	Sharyn Turner	Registered Nurse	Nevada County Superintendent of Schools
15	Scott Whitney	Police Chief	City of Oxnard

Cohort 1 Project Contact List (as of February 8, 2023) Invoice Narrative Examples   December 8, 2021 – Comprehensive Monitoring Visit (CMV) Webinar

1. BSCC CMV Tool
2. BSCC CMV Tool Grantee User Guide
3. BSCC CMV Expectations – On Site
4. BSCC CMV Expectations – Virtual

September 8, 2021- Cannabis Industry, Public Health, and Equity Webinar March 10, 2021 – Invoice and Desk Review Webinar

1. Prop 64 Invoicing and Desk Review PowerPoint
2. Prop 64 Invoice Supporting Documentation Packet Instructions
3. Prop 64 Supporting Documentation Checklist
4. Prop 64 Grantee Salaries and Benefits Worksheet

February 10, 2021 – Quarterly Progress Reports (QPR)  - QPR Agenda - QPR Webinar

1. Prop 64 C1 QPR Q1_2 Grantee Final 2021 Form - updated
2. Prop 64 C1 QPR Guide_Grantee Final 2021 - updated

January 13, 2021 - Local Evaluation Plan (LEP) - LEP Agenda - LEP Webinar

1. Local Evaluation Plan (LEP) and Local Evaluation Report (LER) Guidelines
2. LEP Scoring Rubric
3. Logic Model A
4. Logic Model B
5. Sample LEP
6. Evaluation Resources

November 9-10, 2020 Grantee Orientation – Nov 2020 Agenda

• Orientation Recording - November 9, 2020
• Orientation Recording - November 10, 2020

December 1, 2020 Grantee Orientation - Dec 2020 Agenda

• Orientation Recording – December 1, 2020

Section 1 – Grant Contact Information

1. BSCC Prop 64 Staff Contact Information
2. Prop 64 Cohort 1 Grantee Contact Information
3. Prop 64 Cohort 1 Grant Project Abstracts

Section 2 – BSCC and Grant Overviews

1. BSCC and Prop 64 Overview
2. BSCC Grants Coronavirus FAQs

Section 3 – Administrative Responsibilities

1. Prop 64 Administrative Responsibilities PowerPoint
2. Prop 64 Cohort 1 Grant Agreement Sample
3. BSCC NGO Assurance Form
4. Grantee Contact Information Sheet
5. BSCC Grant Administration Guide
6. Justification for Food & Beverage
7. Justification for Participant & Program Incentives
8. Incentive Inventory & Log Sample
9. Fixed Asset Request Sample

Section 4 – Programmatic Requirements

1. Prop 64 Programmatic Requirements PowerPoint
2. UPDATED July 2024 SAMPLE CMV tool with Instruction

Sample Comprehensive Monitoring Visit (CMV) Tool

3. General Expectations for On-Site CMV
4. Principles of Effective Intervention

Section 5 – Fiscal Responsibilities

1. Fiscal Responsibilities PowerPoint
2. Invoice Workbook Sample
3. Invoice Supporting Documentation
4. Budget Modification Scenarios
5. Grant Audit Requirement

Section 6 – Data Collection & Evaluation Requirements

1. Data Collection & Reporting PowerPoint
2. Local Evaluation Plan & Report Guidelines
3. Local Evaluation Plan Rubric
4. Race & Ethnicity Form
5. Assembly Bill 1998
6. Evaluator Roles
7. Data Collection Tips
8. Evaluation Resources
9. Statewide Logic Model DRAFT
10. Data Reporting Guide & Instructions for QPRs
11. Quarterly Progress Report (QPR) Form